Who should have primary responsibility for evaluating the curriculum for public schools K-12 and private schools K-12? Is there a difference?Who should have input on how effective the curriculum is?Kindly rate 5/5 for my ideas and references:As you briefly validate who should have primary responsibility for evaluating the curriculum for public schools K-12 and private schools K-12, I dont personally think there should be a difference among the school types. If we are the United States (ultimate word suggesting unity), then I advocate that we need to collaborate cohesively and stop the gaps, labels, and disparities among states, as well as the differences among urban and rural, charter and public, private and public; I urge that we need to start using the same assessments to evaluate to demonstrate consistency. One article shows this lack of unity:The author alleges how in terms of testing, Although the vast majority of states have adopted the common core, they wont all be
using the same assessments to gauge learning tied to those standards. Many will use tests developed by the PARCC or smarter Balanced consortium; others will go their own way. How can we foster common core standards if the tests are so diverse?As you examine who should have input on how effective the curriculum is, I endorse a holistic measurement body, where a panel or team of educators, alumni, policymakers, community stakeholders, educational researchers/professors, parents, administrators, and curriculum specialists play an active role in the collaborative process.One article offers insights about assessment:ZILIAN, F. (2013). THE ACADEMIC CURRICULUM REVIEW. Independent School, 73(1), 94-98. Zilian insists that How the academic curriculum coheres and how it supports the schools mission statement should be subjects of frequent review, and this imperative should be embedded in the schools strategic plan. It should also be given priority by the schools top administrators and board of trustees. A regular and comprehensive academic curriculum review — with any turf battles managed by attentive leadership — can be an exceedingly healthy process not only for a schools academic departments, but also for its entire faculty and staff.Curricular unity is mentioned in this article:Jorgenson, O. (2006). Going Private?. Clearing House, 79(6), 265-270. The author demonstrates how when comparing public to private schools, several school administrators cited numerous similarities, including the teachers, students, parents, settings and curriculum, in public and independent schools. Independence, board meetings, presence of unions and media, culture of tradition and employee relationships are some of the differences recognized by some school educators.Another reference seems to echo the unity sentiments:Higgins, C., & Abowitz, K. (2011). WHAT MAKES A PUBLIC SCHOOL PUBLIC? A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING THE CIVIC SUBSTANCE OF SCHOOLING. Educational Theory, 61(4), 365-380.The authors declare, Regardless of their governance structure, Feinberg suggests, all schools should be evaluated on the degree to which they meet various publicity criteria.Another article provides some assistance for curricular assessment resources:Testing and Assessment Resources. (2006). American School Board Journal, 193(1), 45-46. If you can use an Internet source, this flyer suggests that evaluation must …provide reasonable accountability and include assessments that support high-quality learning and school improvement. It must get us out of the downward spiral of producing a nation of children who
mostly learn how to fill in bubbles on multiple-choice tests (fairtest.org/fact-sheet-better-way-evaluate-schools-pdf).References:GEWERTZ, C. (2014). Sizing Up a Four-Year Experiment. Education Week, 33(29), S4-S6. Higgins, C., & Abowitz, K. (2011). WHAT MAKES A PUBLIC SCHOOL PUBLIC? A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING THE CIVIC SUBSTANCE OF SCHOOLING. Educational Theory, 61(4), 365-380. Jorgenson, O. (2006). Going Private?. Clearing House, 79(6), 265-270. Testing and Assessment Resources. (2006). American School Board Journal, 193(1), 45-46. ZILIAN, F. (2013). THE ACADEMIC CURRICULUM REVIEW. Independent School, 73(1), 94-98.
Why Choose Us
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How it Works
- Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.